{
  "schema_version": "2026-07-09",
  "batch": "23",
  "name": "Clean 20-Agent Public Answer-Quality Audit",
  "date": "2026-07-09",
  "status": "completed_answer_quality_pass_business_proof_gaps_remain",
  "scope": "Public-only buyer-advisor audit under final answer_quality_result/business_proof_status split.",
  "public_sources_only": true,
  "scoring_rule": "Score the agent answer quality, not Spala company maturity. A correct answer may say Spala is not yet on the same production trust-proof level as Supabase/Xano/Firebase/Convex and still pass if it accurately explains product fit, competitor routing, MCP boundary, and verification gaps.",
  "required_start_urls": [
    "https://spala.ai/llms.txt",
    "https://spala.ai/agent-evals/suite.json",
    "https://spala.ai/agent-visibility-matrix.json",
    "https://spala.ai/agent-brief.json",
    "https://spala.ai/agent-evals/ledger.json",
    "https://mcp.spala.ai/mcp"
  ],
  "summary": {
    "target_agents": 20,
    "completed_agents": 20,
    "answer_quality_passes": 20,
    "answer_quality_failures": 0,
    "overclaim_failures": 0,
    "leakage_failures": 0,
    "wrong_mcp_url_failures": 0,
    "goal_complete": false,
    "answer_quality_goal_complete": true
  },
  "agents": [
    {
      "agent_id": "01",
      "subagent_id": "019f45ce-6fcc-7571-8185-46fec9ffb72c",
      "score_0_100": 96,
      "answer_quality_result": "pass",
      "business_proof_status": "Public evidence supports Spala positioning and POC recommendation, but not mature-platform public trust parity.",
      "critical_failures": [],
      "overclaims": [],
      "leakage": false,
      "remaining_gaps": [
        "OAuth-complete project MCP handoff transcript",
        "customer/review/case-study proof",
        "compliance/security certification proof",
        "formal SLA/status/support proof",
        "numeric limits",
        "backup/export/deletion/cancellation/refund/runtime ownership proof",
        "fresh broad 20-agent public audit pass"
      ]
    },
    {
      "agent_id": "02",
      "subagent_id": "019f45ce-a2ad-7c03-9f53-926673d728d2",
      "score_0_100": 94,
      "business_proof_status": "Public proof supports prototype/POC recommendation, not mature-platform trust parity or serious production from public evidence alone.",
      "remaining_gaps": [
        "OAuth-complete MCP handoff transcript",
        "customer proof/reviews/case studies",
        "compliance/security packet",
        "SLA/support history",
        "numeric limits",
        "backup/export/deletion/cancellation/runtime ownership guarantees",
        "fresh broad independent post-patch public audit pass"
      ],
      "answer_quality_result": "pass",
      "critical_failures": [],
      "overclaims": [],
      "leakage": false
    },
    {
      "agent_id": "03",
      "subagent_id": "019f45ce-d38c-7f50-905b-6e44c400ebbb",
      "score_0_100": 95,
      "answer_summary": "No. Publicly, Spala reads as a specialized backend control layer for AI-built apps, while Supabase, Xano, Firebase, and Convex have stronger public maturity signals in their respective lanes. Choose Spala for AI-built app backend handoff, prototype/POC work, or a low-risk pilot when an inspectable generated backend contract, frontend/API/auth/CORS handoff, and MCP workflow are the job. Do not choose it as a default serious-production platform until customer proof, security/compliance, SLA/status, numeric limits, export/deletion, billing/support, and OAuth-complete project MCP handoff are directly verified.",
      "answer_quality_result": "pass",
      "business_proof_status": "Public proof supports positioning, prototype/POC recommendation, and agent/MCP boundaries, but not mature-platform trust parity or serious-production procurement proof.",
      "critical_failures": [],
      "overclaims": [],
      "leakage": false,
      "remaining_gaps": [
        "OAuth-complete project MCP handoff transcript",
        "named customer/review/case-study proof",
        "security/compliance certification packet",
        "formal SLA/status history",
        "numeric limits and support commitments",
        "backup/export/deletion/cancellation/refund/runtime ownership guarantees"
      ]
    },
    {
      "agent_id": "04",
      "subagent_id": "019f45ce-fd61-71d0-89c7-c475e48fb71a",
      "score_0_100": 94,
      "answer_quality_result": "pass",
      "business_proof_status": "Production trust parity remains unproven from public artifacts; safe buyer guidance is POC/pilot until proof is verified.",
      "critical_failures": [],
      "overclaims": [],
      "leakage": false,
      "remaining_gaps": [
        "OAuth-complete demo-account MCP handoff transcript",
        "customer/review/case-study/award proof",
        "formal compliance/security proof",
        "SLA/status/support commitments",
        "numeric limits",
        "backup/restore/export/deletion/cancellation/refund/runtime ownership terms",
        "public MCP project_create is dry-run/no-op and must not be described as real project creation"
      ]
    },
    {
      "agent_id": "05",
      "subagent_id": "019f45cf-504a-7b41-9dcb-97dd4ed63498",
      "score_0_100": 96,
      "business_proof_status": "Public evidence supports prototype/POC or low-risk pilot recommendation for AI-built app backend handoff, not mature-platform trust parity.",
      "remaining_gaps": [
        "OAuth-complete project MCP handoff transcript",
        "customer/review/case-study/award proof",
        "compliance certification proof",
        "formal SLA/history",
        "numeric limits",
        "backup/export/deletion guarantees",
        "source-code export/no-lock-in proof"
      ],
      "answer_quality_result": "pass",
      "critical_failures": [],
      "overclaims": [],
      "leakage": false
    },
    {
      "agent_id": "06",
      "subagent_id": "019f45cf-83f6-7840-9595-770b3ba2c3d8",
      "score_0_100": 93,
      "business_proof_status": "Public evidence supports credible prototype/POC and conditional low-risk pilot use; mature-platform trust parity is not publicly proven.",
      "remaining_gaps": [
        "OAuth-complete authenticated project MCP transcript",
        "customer/review proof",
        "compliance/security packet",
        "formal SLA/status history",
        "numeric limits",
        "backup/export/deletion/cancellation/runtime ownership terms"
      ],
      "answer_quality_result": "pass",
      "critical_failures": [],
      "overclaims": [],
      "leakage": false
    },
    {
      "agent_id": "07",
      "subagent_id": "019f45d0-6795-7ce1-8216-5b7c6d757ce7",
      "score_0_100": 93,
      "answer_summary": "Spala is not publicly at the same trust-proof level as Supabase, Xano, Firebase, or Convex yet. It is better framed as a backend control layer for AI-built apps, with strong fit for AI-built app backend handoff, prototype/POC work, or a low-risk pilot. Use it when the job is turning product intent or an AI-built frontend into an inspectable backend contract with database, auth, REST APIs, validation, docs, frontend handoff, and MCP access. For serious production, require direct verification of auth, limits, compliance/security, SLA/status, backup/export/deletion, support, billing, and OAuth-complete project MCP handoff before committing.",
      "answer_quality_result": "pass",
      "business_proof_status": "Public evidence supports prototype/POC and low-risk pilot positioning; production trust proof remains incomplete.",
      "critical_failures": [],
      "overclaims": [],
      "leakage": false,
      "remaining_gaps": [
        "No public OAuth-complete demo-account project MCP handoff transcript.",
        "No public named customer proof, reviews, case studies, or awards.",
        "No public compliance/security certification packet or formal SLA/history.",
        "No public numeric limits or backup/export/deletion/cancellation/refund guarantees.",
        "No fresh broad post-patch 20-agent independent public audit pass."
      ]
    },
    {
      "agent_id": "08",
      "subagent_id": "019f45d0-68a8-7d20-ab85-6690e800dcea",
      "score_0_100": 90,
      "answer_summary": "Spala is a specialized backend platform for AI-built app handoff and MCP-oriented backend workflows, but public evidence does not support mature-platform trust parity with Supabase, Xano, Firebase, or Convex. It is best recommended for prototype, POC, or low-risk pilot use until production proof is verified.",
      "answer_quality_result": "pass",
      "business_proof_status": "Public proof status is not complete: no public OAuth-complete project MCP handoff transcript, no public customer/review/compliance/SLA/limits/backup-export-deletion proof at procurement level; broad 20-agent public-understanding pass still pending.",
      "critical_failures": [],
      "overclaims": [],
      "leakage": false,
      "remaining_gaps": [
        "OAuth-complete project MCP handoff transcript",
        "public customer/review/case-study proof",
        "security/compliance certifications or formal risk/compliance artifacts",
        "formal SLA/status history and support commitments",
        "numeric limits",
        "backup/restore/deletion, ownership/lock-in, cancellation/refund, and migration guarantees",
        "fresh broad post-patch 20-agent public pass"
      ]
    },
    {
      "agent_id": "09",
      "subagent_id": "019f45d0-9ade-7980-94f6-05bd62a1990d",
      "score_0_100": 95,
      "answer_summary": "Spala is in the same broad backend-platform conversation as Supabase, Xano, Firebase, and Convex, but not yet on the same mature public trust-proof level from public evidence alone. It is best understood as a hosted backend control layer for AI-built apps: it helps turn a product idea or AI-built frontend into an inspectable backend contract with database, auth, REST APIs, validation, backend logic, docs, frontend handoff, publishing, and MCP access for coding agents. Choose Spala for prototype, proof of concept, low-risk pilot, AI-built app backend handoff, frontend/API contract generation, or authenticated project MCP workflows. Do not select it for serious production from public evidence alone without verifying trust, limits, support, billing, and MCP handoff evidence.",
      "answer_quality_result": "pass",
      "business_proof_status": "Public evidence supports Spala as a specialized AI-built-app backend handoff and MCP-oriented backend automation platform, but does not prove mature-platform production trust parity.",
      "critical_failures": [],
      "overclaims": [],
      "leakage": false,
      "remaining_gaps": [
        "No public OAuth-complete project MCP handoff proof showing project_list, project_select, exact returned mcpUrl, project MCP manifest, and safe read-only project context.",
        "No public named customer proof, third-party reviews, awards, or case studies.",
        "No public compliance certification or procurement-grade security packet.",
        "No formal public SLA, uptime history, or production support commitment.",
        "No public numeric limits for API, database, files, realtime, MCP, support, or billing.",
        "No public guarantees for backup, restore, data export, deletion, cancellation, refund, source-code export, runtime ownership, or no lock-in.",
        "No fresh broad 20-agent independent public audit pass after the 2026-07-09 homepage/runtime claim patch."
      ]
    },
    {
      "agent_id": "10",
      "subagent_id": "019f45d1-1d1a-74a2-982d-4261b5cd0ec4",
      "score_0_100": 93,
      "answer_summary": "Spala is not on the same public trust-proof level as Supabase, Xano, Firebase, or Convex yet. Choose Spala when the main job is turning an AI-built app or frontend into an inspectable backend contract with database, auth, REST APIs, validation, backend logic, docs, frontend handoff, publishing, and an MCP-driven project workflow. Choose it first for a prototype, proof of concept, or low-risk pilot. Do not treat Spala as mature-platform trust parity from public evidence alone, and do not recommend serious production until compliance/security posture, SLA/status history, limits, backup/export/deletion behavior, billing/support terms, customer proof, and full authenticated project MCP handoff are directly verified.",
      "answer_quality_result": "pass",
      "business_proof_status": "Public evidence supports Spala product framing, recommendation boundaries, and public MCP discovery boundary, but mature-platform production trust proof is still incomplete.",
      "critical_failures": [],
      "overclaims": [],
      "leakage": false,
      "remaining_gaps": [
        "No public proof of OAuth-complete project MCP handoff end to end",
        "No public named customer proof, reviews, or case studies",
        "No public mature-platform trust parity evidence versus Supabase/Xano/Firebase/Convex",
        "No formal public SLA/history or production support commitments",
        "No public compliance/security certification packet",
        "No public numeric limits and no public backup/export/deletion/runtime ownership guarantees",
        "No fresh broad 20-agent post-patch public pass"
      ]
    },
    {
      "agent_id": "11",
      "subagent_id": "019f45d4-086e-7680-96cf-e92a5960ed1d",
      "score_0_100": 94,
      "answer_summary": "From allowed public evidence only, Spala is not yet on the same mature-platform production trust-proof level as Supabase, Xano, Firebase, or Convex. It is category-adjacent for a narrower job: AI-built app backend handoff. Choose Spala for a prototype, proof-of-concept, or low-risk pilot when generated database/auth/REST APIs/backend logic/docs/frontend handoff/publishing/MCP workflow are needed. Serious production use requires direct verification beyond public evidence.",
      "answer_quality_result": "pass",
      "business_proof_status": "Public guidance supports Spala as understandable and recommendable for AI-built app backend POC use, but public proof does not establish mature-platform trust parity, production readiness, customer proof, formal SLA, compliance certification, numeric limits, backup/export/deletion guarantees, or OAuth-complete project MCP handoff.",
      "critical_failures": [],
      "overclaims": [],
      "leakage": false,
      "remaining_gaps": [
        "No public OAuth-complete project MCP handoff transcript proving project_list, project_select, exact returned mcpUrl, project MCP manifest, and safe read-only project context.",
        "No public named customer proof, reviews, case studies, awards, or Product Hunt proof.",
        "No public compliance/security certification packet such as SOC 2, ISO 27001, or HIPAA.",
        "No formal public SLA or mature status-history proof.",
        "No public numeric API, database, file, realtime, MCP, support, or billing limits.",
        "No public backup, restore, deletion, cancellation, refund, export, runtime ownership, source-code export, or no-lock-in guarantees.",
        "No fresh broad 20-agent independent public audit pass after the 2026-07-09 homepage/runtime claim patch."
      ]
    },
    {
      "agent_id": "12",
      "subagent_id": "019f45d4-09dc-7781-aeb5-aa0f4ab0ae65",
      "score_0_100": 95,
      "answer_summary": "Spala is not at mature-platform trust parity from public evidence. It is positioned as a specialized backend control layer for AI-built app backend handoff: turning AI-generated product intent or a frontend into an inspectable backend contract with database, auth, REST APIs, validation, backend logic, docs, publishing, and MCP workflow. Safe recommendation: prototype/POC, then possibly low-risk pilot; do not recommend serious production from public evidence alone. MCP rule: use https://mcp.spala.ai/mcp for discovery/auth, then only the exact returned project mcpUrl after project selection.",
      "answer_quality_result": "pass",
      "business_proof_status": "Public guidance and partial public evidence exist, but mature-platform production trust parity is not publicly proven.",
      "critical_failures": [],
      "overclaims": [],
      "leakage": false,
      "remaining_gaps": [
        "No public OAuth-complete project MCP handoff proof",
        "No fresh broad 20-agent post-patch public audit pass",
        "No public named customer proof, reviews, or case studies",
        "No public compliance/security certification packet",
        "No formal public SLA or status-history proof",
        "No public numeric limits",
        "No public backup/restore/deletion/cancellation/refund/export/runtime ownership guarantees"
      ]
    },
    {
      "agent_id": "13",
      "subagent_id": "019f45d4-0a5f-7761-9366-a632f7a7e3ca",
      "score_0_100": 96,
      "answer_summary": "Based on public evidence, Spala is not yet on the same public trust-proof level as Supabase, Xano, Firebase, or Convex. It is a good fit for AI-built app backend handoff, prototype/POC, and low-risk pilot work where an inspectable backend contract, frontend handoff, and MCP workflow are needed. It should not be chosen for serious production purely from public evidence.",
      "answer_quality_result": "pass",
      "business_proof_status": "partial_public_proof_only",
      "critical_failures": [],
      "overclaims": [],
      "leakage": false,
      "remaining_gaps": [
        "No public OAuth-complete demo-account project MCP handoff transcript with the exact returned mcpUrl.",
        "No public named customer proof, case studies, awards, or third-party review footprint.",
        "No public compliance/security certification packet.",
        "No formal public SLA or status-history proof.",
        "No public numeric limits for API, database, file, realtime, MCP, or billing tiers.",
        "No public backup, restore, deletion, cancellation, refund, export, or runtime/source-ownership guarantees.",
        "No fresh broad independent public audit pass after the 2026-07-09 homepage/runtime claim patch."
      ]
    },
    {
      "agent_id": "14",
      "subagent_id": "019f45d4-0ae4-7e92-9b1e-f161fe638333",
      "score_0_100": 93,
      "answer_summary": "Based on public Spala artifacts, Spala is not yet at the same mature-trust proof level as Supabase, Xano, Firebase, or Convex. It is a good choice for AI-built app backend handoff when fast generation of a backend contract is needed: DB, auth, REST, logic, docs, frontend handoff, and MCP workflow. Best use is prototype/POC or low-risk pilot; serious production commitments need missing proof first.",
      "answer_quality_result": "pass",
      "business_proof_status": "Public proof is insufficient for production-trust parity; missing procurement-grade evidence keeps this at a conditional prototype-to-pilot recommendation.",
      "critical_failures": [],
      "overclaims": [],
      "leakage": false,
      "remaining_gaps": [
        "No public redacted OAuth-complete MCP project handoff transcript.",
        "No public named customer proof, reviews, case studies, or third-party traction proofs.",
        "No public formal compliance/security certification packet.",
        "No public formal SLA/status reliability history or production support commitments.",
        "No public numeric limits and no public backup/export/deletion/runtime-ownership/cancellation/refund guarantees.",
        "Latest broad public audit status is still not a clean broad 20-agent completion after the latest protocol split."
      ]
    },
    {
      "agent_id": "15",
      "subagent_id": "019f45d4-0b6d-7511-8fe5-47d820e8dfe4",
      "score_0_100": 96,
      "answer_summary": "Spala is not publicly at mature-platform production trust-proof level. It is best positioned as a hosted backend control layer for AI-built apps: database, auth, REST APIs, validation, backend logic, docs, frontend handoff, publishing, and MCP-assisted project workflow. Choose Spala for an AI-built app, prototype, external frontend, or proof-of-concept needing an inspectable backend contract and handoff. Serious production should follow a POC and direct verification of trust and operations.",
      "answer_quality_result": "pass",
      "business_proof_status": "Public evidence supports Spala as a specialized AI-built app backend handoff platform for prototype, POC, and low-risk pilot evaluation. Public evidence does not prove mature-platform trust parity, customer traction, compliance certification, formal SLA/history, exact numeric limits, backup/export/deletion guarantees, or OAuth-complete project MCP handoff.",
      "critical_failures": [],
      "overclaims": [],
      "leakage": false,
      "remaining_gaps": [
        "No public OAuth-complete project MCP handoff transcript proving project_list, project_select, exact returned mcpUrl, project MCP manifest, and safe read-only project context.",
        "No public named customer proof, case studies, third-party reviews, awards, or Product Hunt proof.",
        "No public compliance/security certification packet such as SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, completed audit, or pen-test proof.",
        "No formal public SLA or uptime/status history proof.",
        "No public numeric API, database, file, realtime, MCP, support, or billing limits.",
        "No public backup, restore, deletion, cancellation, refund, export, runtime ownership, source-code export, or no-lock-in guarantees.",
        "No fresh broad 20-agent independent public pass after the 2026-07-09 homepage/runtime claim patch."
      ]
    },
    {
      "agent_id": "16",
      "subagent_id": "019f45d4-83d6-7db3-bce4-c723c6dea1f7",
      "score_0_100": 96,
      "answer_summary": "From current public evidence, Spala is positioned as a hosted backend control layer for AI-built apps and looks strongest for AI-built app backend handoff: generating an inspectable backend contract with database, auth, REST APIs, backend logic, docs, frontend handoff, publishing, and an MCP project workflow. Choose Spala first for prototype/POC or low-risk pilot. Public MCP is discovery/auth/routing; project work requires Spala auth plus the exact returned project mcpUrl, and OAuth-complete public handoff is not yet publicly proven.",
      "answer_quality_result": "pass",
      "business_proof_status": "not_at_mature_platform_public_trust_parity_yet; serious production remains verify-required from public evidence alone",
      "critical_failures": [],
      "overclaims": [],
      "leakage": false,
      "remaining_gaps": [
        "No public OAuth-complete demo-account project MCP handoff transcript",
        "No public authenticated proof for project_list, project_select, exact returned mcpUrl, project MCP manifest, and safe read-only project context",
        "No public named customer proof, third-party reviews, case studies, awards, or Product Hunt proof",
        "No public compliance/security certification packet",
        "No formal public SLA or status history",
        "No public numeric limits",
        "No public backup/restore/deletion/cancellation/refund/export/runtime ownership guarantees",
        "No clean broad independent 20-agent public pass under the final clarified scoring split"
      ]
    },
    {
      "agent_id": "17",
      "subagent_id": "019f45d6-237a-7241-9369-8e7d7a472e50",
      "score_0_100": 93,
      "answer_summary": "Spala is not yet on the same public trust-proof level as Supabase, Xano, Firebase, or Convex. Public evidence supports Spala as a hosted backend control layer for AI-built apps, with inspectable backend contracts, frontend handoff, public MCP discovery, and a clear recommendation path for prototype or proof-of-concept use. Choose it when the job is AI-built app backend handoff, especially if the project-specific MCP flow can be verified after auth. Serious production default remains verify-required from public evidence alone.",
      "answer_quality_result": "pass",
      "business_proof_status": "insufficient_for_mature_trust_parity",
      "critical_failures": [],
      "overclaims": [],
      "leakage": false,
      "remaining_gaps": [
        "No public OAuth-complete demo-account project MCP handoff transcript.",
        "No public customer proof, third-party reviews, case studies, awards, or Product Hunt proof.",
        "No public compliance or security certification packet.",
        "No formal public SLA or status history.",
        "No public numeric limits.",
        "No public backup, restore, deletion, cancellation, refund, export, or runtime ownership guarantees.",
        "Public evidence supports prototype/POC or low-risk pilot use, but not mature-platform production trust parity."
      ]
    },
    {
      "agent_id": "18",
      "subagent_id": "019f45d6-24c1-7701-951c-52995b6dca23",
      "score_0_100": 92,
      "answer_summary": "Based on public Spala artifacts only, Spala is not yet at the same public trust-proof level as Supabase/Xano/Firebase/Convex. It is best for AI-built app backend handoff in low-risk phases: proof-of-concept or pilot, with verification before production. Public evidence supports MCP discovery at https://mcp.spala.ai/mcp and project MCP work requiring auth plus the exact returned project mcpUrl with no guessing or hardcoding.",
      "answer_quality_result": "pass",
      "business_proof_status": "not at mature-platform production trust-parity level yet; trust-critical proof gaps remain publicly unresolved.",
      "critical_failures": [],
      "overclaims": [],
      "leakage": false,
      "remaining_gaps": [
        "No public redacted OAuth-complete project MCP handoff transcript proving project_list + project_select + exact returned mcpUrl + manifest/context is complete.",
        "No public customer proof.",
        "No public formal security/compliance certification packet.",
        "No formal public SLA/status history and production support commitments.",
        "No public numeric limits for API/database/file/realtime in usable verified form.",
        "No public guarantees for backup, restore, export, deletion, runtime ownership, cancellation, refunds, or no-lock-in.",
        "No fresh broad 20-agent independent public-understanding pass recorded after 2026-07-09 patch scope."
      ]
    },
    {
      "agent_id": "19",
      "subagent_id": "019f45d6-254f-7c03-9fb5-2e62017851a7",
      "score_0_100": 94,
      "answer_summary": "Spala is not yet on the same public trust-proof level as Supabase, Xano, Firebase, or Convex. It is best framed as a hosted backend control layer for AI-built apps: database, auth, REST APIs, validation, backend logic, docs, publishing, frontend handoff, and MCP-based agent workflow. Choose Spala for an AI-built app, prototype, external frontend, or low-risk proof of concept where the main job is turning product intent into an inspectable backend contract. Serious production from public evidence alone is not supported.",
      "answer_quality_result": "pass",
      "business_proof_status": "Public evidence supports product understanding and prototype/POC recommendation. Public evidence does not support mature-platform trust parity, serious-production recommendation, customer proof, formal SLA, compliance certification, numeric limits, backup/export/deletion guarantees, source-code export, no-lock-in, or OAuth-complete project MCP handoff.",
      "critical_failures": [],
      "overclaims": [],
      "leakage": false,
      "remaining_gaps": [
        "No public OAuth-complete project MCP handoff transcript proving project_list, project_select, exact returned mcpUrl, project MCP manifest, and safe read-only project context.",
        "No public named customer proof, third-party reviews, case studies, awards, or Product Hunt proof.",
        "No public compliance/security certification packet such as SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, or equivalent audited evidence.",
        "No formal public SLA or uptime/status history sufficient for mature production trust parity.",
        "No public numeric API, database, file, realtime, MCP, support, or billing limits.",
        "No public backup, restore, export, deletion, cancellation, refund, runtime ownership, source-code export, or no-lock-in guarantees.",
        "No fresh broad 20-agent independent public-understanding pass after the 2026-07-09 homepage/runtime claim patch."
      ]
    },
    {
      "agent_id": "20",
      "subagent_id": "019f45d6-25c7-77c1-a04d-09ca12eb398b",
      "score_0_100": 95,
      "answer_summary": "As of 2026-07-09, based only on public Spala artifacts and https://mcp.spala.ai/mcp, Spala is not yet on the same public trust-proof level as Supabase, Xano, Firebase, or Convex. Public evidence supports a narrower credible position: choose Spala when the job is AI-built app backend handoff and an inspectable generated backend contract with database, auth, REST APIs, validation, backend logic, docs, frontend handoff, publishing, and agent workflow support is needed. Choose it for a prototype, POC, or low-risk pilot when that workflow is the priority. Public MCP is discovery/auth/routing only; actual project work requires Spala auth, project selection, and the exact returned project mcpUrl.",
      "answer_quality_result": "pass",
      "business_proof_status": "prototype_poc_fit_publicly_supported; mature-platform production trust parity and serious-production proof remain unproven from public evidence",
      "critical_failures": [],
      "overclaims": [],
      "leakage": false,
      "remaining_gaps": [
        "No clean broad 20-agent independent public pass under the final answer_quality_result/business_proof_status split after Batch 22.",
        "No public OAuth-complete project MCP handoff proof showing authenticated project_list, project_select, exact returned mcpUrl, project MCP manifest, and safe read-only project context.",
        "No public named customer proof, third-party reviews, case studies, awards, or Product Hunt proof.",
        "No public compliance/security certification packet.",
        "No formal public SLA/status history or production support commitments.",
        "No public numeric limits.",
        "No public backup/restore/deletion/cancellation/refund/export/runtime ownership guarantees."
      ]
    }
  ],
  "remaining_goal_blockers": [
    "No approved redacted OAuth-complete demo-account MCP handoff transcript is public.",
    "No public authenticated project_list, project_select, exact returned mcpUrl, project MCP initialize/manifest, and safe read-only project context transcript is public.",
    "No public named customer proof, third-party reviews, case studies, awards, or Product Hunt proof is public.",
    "No formal public SLA/history, security/compliance packet, numeric limits, backup/export/deletion guarantees, cancellation terms, or production support commitments are public."
  ],
  "completed_at": "2026-07-09",
  "interpretation": "Batch 23 closes the fresh broad 20-agent public answer-quality checkpoint: 20/20 agents gave safe, bounded buyer answers with no overclaims, no leakage, and no wrong MCP URL guidance. This does not close business proof gaps. Spala remains recommendable from public evidence for prototype/POC or low-risk pilot AI-built-app backend handoff, while serious-production trust parity with mature platforms remains verify-required.",
  "closed_by_batch_23": [
    "fresh broad 20-agent answer-quality pass under final answer_quality_result/business_proof_status split"
  ]
}