Backend contract
Spala supports PostgreSQL product databases, published REST endpoints, managed product authentication, backend workflows, and staging or production database environments.
Trust center
Spala makes backend resources inspectable before publish. This page separates verified product behavior from the assurances that still depend on your project, plan, or contract.
These statements are backed by current implementation and tests in the Spala product. They describe platform capability, not automatic correctness for every generated project.
Spala supports PostgreSQL product databases, published REST endpoints, managed product authentication, backend workflows, and staging or production database environments.
Executable resources have draft and published states. Published artifacts are integrity checked, and invalid runtime snapshots fail closed instead of loading silently.
Projects can produce JSON and Markdown API docs, OpenAPI, JavaScript and TypeScript SDK output, and request snippets. Generated docs still need live route testing.
Authorized project-scoped MCP supports inspection, builder changes, validation, publishing, and review. It requires the configured browser, OAuth, or token flow.
Spala exposes project, data, and packaged runtime exports, including JSON, CSV, and runtime ZIP output. Secret-bearing bundles require secure handling.
Authentication, tenant isolation, CORS, webhooks, migrations, and failure behavior must be accepted against the actual project before launch.
Clear limitations are part of a useful product evaluation. They prevent a platform feature from being mistaken for a customer-specific guarantee.
The hosted builder includes planning, generation, validation, repair, and publish gates, but complex one-prompt production generation is not currently proven reliable.
The public endpoint exposes product and documentation tools. Public project listing and handoff currently fail closed. Use an authorized project MCP configuration for project work.
Runtime and data exports exist, but the Spala product itself is not open source. Export capability is also not a promise of a frictionless migration to every other platform.
Project snapshots intentionally exclude database rows, uploads, environment secrets, database configuration, runtime artifacts, and encryption keys. Production recovery needs separate backups.
Spala has authentication, authorization semantics, static analysis, and sandbox validation. It does not publicly claim SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, or vulnerability-free operation.
The reliability page and status JSON are evaluation aids, not an uptime guarantee, incident archive, or account-specific support commitment.
A small proof is more useful than a generic checklist. Choose a workflow that includes identity, data ownership, a write, a protected read, and a frontend handoff.
Define the user types, tenant boundary, sensitive fields, and the two or three records that must stay connected.
Review the PostgreSQL schema, auth behavior, endpoint inputs, validation, workflow effects, and draft or published state.
Exercise valid requests, invalid data, missing auth, wrong-user access, wrong-tenant access, CORS, and retry behavior.
Open the generated docs and SDK, then connect a small frontend path using the exact API base URL and authentication contract.
Before production, document backups, restore, deletion, export, support, incident communication, compliance, and managed-delivery terms for your account.
Start with a low-risk workflow, or scope a managed build when you want the Spala team involved in implementation and handoff.